Wulandari, Tri (2015) FINAL REPORT GRAMMATICAL ERRORS FOUND IN THE GUIDEBOOK OF SULTAN MAHMUD BADARUDDIN II MUSEUM 2008. Other thesis, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya.
|
Text (COVER)
FILE I.pdf Download (969kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION)
FILE II.pdf Download (281kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW)
FILE III.pdf Download (466kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.polsri.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (CHAPTER III METHOD)
FILE IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (93kB) |
|
|
Text (CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION)
FILE V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (369kB) |
|
|
Text (CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS)
FILE VI.pdf Download (87kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (REFERENCES)
FILE VII.pdf Download (321kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The problems of this final report were, “what are the errors found in The Guidebook of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum 2008?”, and, “what is the error most commonly found in The Guidebook of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum 2008?” The purposes of this final report were to analyze the errors found in The Guidebook of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum 2008 and to analyze the error most commonly found in The Guidebook of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum 2008. The writer used descriptive method. The object of this final report was The Guidebook of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum 2008 contained two languages. The writer collected the data by doing the observation from the object the analyzed, classified, and made the percentage of the errors found in the book. In this report, the writer found there were 38.5% errors in sentences that contained five omission errors, 7.7% errors in sentences that contained one addition errors, and 53.8% errors in sentences that contained seven misformation errors. The most dominant kind of error was misformation errors.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | The writer collected the data by doing the observation from the object the analyzed, classified, and made the percentage of the errors found in the book. In this report, the writer found there were 38.5% errors in sentences that contained five omission errors, 7.7% errors in sentences that contained one addition errors, and 53.8% errors in sentences that contained seven misformation errors. The most dominant kind of error was misformation errors. |
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > PE English |
| Divisions: | English > Undergraduate Theses |
| Depositing User: | Mrs Trisni Handayani |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2016 05:40 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Jan 2016 05:40 |
| URI: | http://eprints.polsri.ac.id/id/eprint/2169 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
