DWISTYA, YUCHA (2017) GRAPHICAL ARGUMENT ANALYSISOF STUDENT DEBATE: CASE STUDY OF ENGLISH DEBATING SOCIETY AT POLYTECHNIC STATE OF SRIWIJAYA. Other thesis, POLITEKNIK NEGERI SRIWIJAYA.
|
Text (Cover)
FILE I.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (Chapter I Introduction)
FILE II.pdf Download (279kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (Chapter II Literature Review)
FILE III.pdf Download (421kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.polsri.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Chapter III Research Methodology)
FILE IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (276kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text (Chapter IV Finding And Discussion)
FILE V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (468kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text (Chapter V Conclusion And Suggestion)
FILE VI.pdf Download (251kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (References)
FILE VII.pdf Download (158kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Appendices Yucha.pdf Download (286kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The research study analyzed the structure of debater’s argument using Toulmin Model of Argumentation (1989). The research also adopted the Graphical Argument Analysis proposed by Homer-Dixon and Karapin to examine the relations among the elements and the plausibility of students arguments in the debate. The transcript argumentwas analyzed using qualitative method under the motion This House Would Legalize Marijuana in Canada.The writer found five elements in debater’s argument structure namely claim, data, warrant, backing, and rebuttal elements. There are also relations such claim, data, warrant, backing, and rebuttal relations. Finally, this study revealed that the Negative Team as a team that has the most plausible arguments over the Affirmative Team. This study provides understanding, criticism, and improvement of debaters arguments. It is hoped to be useful by a wide range of people and especially those who are affected by arguments such as academic writers, students, teachers and debate adjudicators.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Toulmin Model of Argumentation, Grpahical Analysis, Debate, Plausibility |
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > PE English P Language and Literature > PR English literature |
| Divisions: | English > Undergraduate Theses |
| Depositing User: | Mrs Trisni Handayani |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Dec 2017 02:04 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Dec 2017 02:04 |
| URI: | http://eprints.polsri.ac.id/id/eprint/4237 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
